'Supergirl' Review: Milly Alcock Shines, But the Story Feels Familiar
The New York Times · June 25, 2026
Key takeaways
- Critics praise Milly Alcock's performance as Supergirl even while calling the film's origin-story structure predictable.
- The movie is a key piece of James Gunn's rebooted DC Universe, following 'Superman' in the shared continuity.
- A mixed critical reception on story doesn't undercut the bigger takeaway: Alcock looks poised to anchor future DC films.
The Verdict: A Star-Making Turn in a Predictable Package
Milly Alcock's first outing as Kara Zor-El is getting the kind of review every studio prays for and every fan half-expects: she's the best part of a movie that plays it a little too safe. The New York Times' take on "Supergirl" lands right where you'd guess — praise for Alcock's charisma and physicality, gentle side-eye for a script that hits the same origin-story beats we've seen a dozen times since Christopher Reeve first put on a cape.
If you've followed Alcock's rise from "House of the Dragon" breakout to DC's newest cornerstone, this review confirms what casting directors clearly saw early: she's got the warmth and steel to carry a franchise lead. The problem, according to critics, isn't her. It's the machinery around her.
Why the Origin Story Formula Keeps Showing Up
Every superhero movie faces the same math problem: audiences need backstory, but backstory is the least exciting part of any hero's journey. "Supergirl" reportedly leans hard into the familiar arc — alien orphan, adoptive family, discovery of powers, first fight with a villain who exists mostly to justify a third-act explosion. It's comfort food, and comfort food sells tickets, but it rarely wins over critics looking for something new.
This matters because "Supergirl" isn't just another standalone movie — it's a building block in James Gunn's rebooted DC Universe, following "Superman" and setting up whatever crossover ambitions come next. A shaky critical reception doesn't necessarily sink the box office, but it does shape the conversation around whether Gunn's DCU can differentiate itself from a decade of Marvel's own origin-story fatigue.
What This Means for DC's Bigger Bet
Studios don't just want good reviews — they want proof a character can anchor sequels, spin-offs, and eventually team-ups. Alcock getting singled out as a standout, even inside a movie critics call formulaic, is actually a solid outcome for Warner Bros. It suggests the studio found its Kara. The next film just needs a script that trusts her enough to take bigger swings.
The Bottom Line
"Supergirl" won't be remembered as a genre-redefining movie, but it may be remembered as the moment Milly Alcock became a legitimate blockbuster lead. For DC, that's arguably the more important win.
Why it matters
If you're invested in the next era of superhero movies, this review is an early signal of how DC's post-'Superman' universe is being received critically. It also marks Milly Alcock's arrival as a potential franchise-carrying star to watch.
Want deals on what you love?
Val finds local offers matched to your interests — free to start.
Meet Val
