Economist Steven Rattner's Graph Exposes Trump's Job Growth Collapse
alternet · August 10, 2026
Key takeaways
- Average monthly job creation dropped from 122k in 2024 (Biden's final year) to just 33k in 2025-26 under Trump, per Rattner's graph.
- July's jobs report showed a loss of 23,000 jobs, with May and June figures revised down by a combined 103,000.
- The comparison directly challenges Trump's public claims of economic strength using BLS data.
What Happened Steven Rattner — investor, MS NOW economic analyst, and former lead adviser to Obama's auto industry task force — posted a graph on X that's making the rounds for a simple reason: it's brutal and easy to understand. The chart compares monthly job creation in the final year of Biden's presidency against Trump's second term so far. The verdict, in Rattner's words: average monthly job creation "fallen dramatically: from 122k/month in 2024 to 33k/month in 2025-26."
The graph doesn't just show a slowdown — it shows the trend line sliding downward the longer Trump's term goes on, with monthly job numbers dipping into negative territory only after he took office. Rattner also flagged a particularly ugly jobs report from last week, calling it "shockingly negative": the economy lost 23,000 jobs in July, and previous estimates for May and June got revised down by 103,000 combined.
Why the Graph Hit a Nerve Trump has repeatedly claimed credit for a booming economy and strong jobs picture. Rattner's chart is designed to counter that narrative with a side-by-side comparison that's hard to spin: Biden's final year averaged four times the monthly job creation of Trump's current run. It's the kind of visual that spreads fast on social media precisely because it requires no economics degree to interpret — just eyeballs and a bar chart.
Rattner has been a consistent critic of Trump's economic messaging, frequently pointing out gaps between the administration's talking points and the underlying data. This latest post fits that pattern, using the Bureau of Labor Statistics' own revision patterns — which showed May and June's numbers were worse than first reported — to argue the labor market is weaker than advertised, not stronger.
What Reader Should Know Jobs numbers are often revised in the months after their initial release, and downward revisions like the ones Rattner cited can signal that the labor market is losing momentum faster than headlines suggest. Whether this becomes a bigger political flashpoint depends on whether the trend continues into the fall, and whether the White House offers its own counter-data. For now, the graph is a snapshot — but it's a snapshot that's landing hard in an economy where wage growth, inflation, and hiring confidence are already top of mind for a lot of households.
Why it matters
Jobs numbers shape everything from interest rate decisions to consumer confidence, so a real slowdown — not just a messaging dispute — could affect hiring, wages, and household budgets. Understanding the gap between political claims and actual labor data helps readers separate spin from what's really happening in the economy.
Want deals on what you love?
Val finds local offers matched to your interests — free to start.
Meet Val