Trump Backs New Crypto Ethics Rules to Save Senate's Clarity Act
CNBC · September 14, 2026
Key takeaways
- Trump agreed to new ethics restrictions limiting how he, his family, and officials can profit from crypto ventures, aimed at winning over Democratic senators.
- The Clarity Act needs 60 votes to advance, requiring at least seven Democrats to support it alongside a unified GOP.
- Banks and the crypto industry are both lobbying hard, with banks pushing for stablecoin interest payment restrictions before they'll back the bill.
What Happened The long-stalled crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act just got a last-minute makeover. President Trump agreed to new ethics restrictions aimed at preventing himself, his family, and administration officials from profiting off crypto ventures — a concession Republican leaders hope will finally unlock enough Democratic votes to move the bill forward.
The Senate is set for a preliminary vote Tuesday that would end debate and push the bill toward final passage. But it's not a done deal. The legislation needs 60 votes to survive a filibuster, meaning at least seven Democrats have to cross the aisle even with full attendance.
Why the Bill Has Been Stuck The Clarity Act would create the first comprehensive federal framework for regulating cryptocurrencies and other digital assets — something the industry has wanted for years. It cleared the Senate Banking Committee back in May, but only two Democrats supported it then, and the bill has been in limbo ever since.
Two big sticking points have kept it stalled:
- **Banks are worried about stablecoins.** Financial institutions warn that without a fix banning interest-like payments on stablecoins, customers could pull deposits out of traditional banks and chase higher yields in crypto accounts instead.
- **Democrats want stronger ethics guardrails.** Given Trump's own ties to crypto ventures, Democratic senators have insisted on explicit language preventing the president, his family, and officials from personally cashing in on the industry they'd be regulating.
The New Compromise Republican bill leaders released updated text late Sunday night that they're calling their final offer. It reportedly incorporates much of an ethics agreement worked out between Sens. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) and Ruben Gallego, aimed squarely at satisfying Democratic concerns about self-dealing at the top.
Whether that's enough remains an open question. Banking industry lobbyists are still pushing hard on the stablecoin issue, and crypto industry groups are lobbying just as hard to get the bill across the finish line without further delays. It's a classic Washington crunch: two powerful industries and two political parties all trying to shape the rules before the vote actually happens.
What It Means Going Forward If the Clarity Act passes, it would be the most significant piece of crypto regulation in U.S. history, giving the industry the legal certainty it's been demanding for years — clear rules on what counts as a security versus a commodity, who regulates what, and how stablecoins should operate. If it stalls again, crypto markets stay in a regulatory gray zone that's frustrated both innovators and law enforcement alike.
Either way, Tuesday's vote is a real test of whether bipartisan crypto legislation is possible in this Congress — or whether ethics concerns tied directly to the president make that politically impossible.
Why it matters
This bill would set the first comprehensive federal rules for crypto in the U.S., directly affecting how digital assets are taxed, traded, and regulated for everyday investors. It's also a rare test of whether ethics concerns tied to a sitting president can be resolved through legislative compromise.
Want deals on what you love?
Val finds local offers matched to your interests — free to start.
Meet Val